Cities and Towns of the UK

Britain is one of the most urbanized countries in Europe (and probably in the world with some 90 % of urban population). There are now 61 cities in the UK: 49 in England, five in Scotland, four in Wales and three in Northern Ireland.

City status is a mark of distinction granted by the personal Command of the Sovereign, on the advice of his or her Ministers.

The largest cities in the UK with the population exceeding 1 mil­lion people are London (7,074,265) and Birmingham (1,020,589).

Below is the updat­ed list, (in alphabetical order) of the cities of all 4 countries of the United Kingdom.

England:

Bath, Birmingham, Bradford, Bristol, Cambridge, Canterbury, Carlisle, Chester, Chichester, Coventry, Derby, Durham, Ely, Exeter, Gloucester, Hereford, Kingston- upon-Hull, Lancaster, Leeds, Leicester, Lichfield, Lincoln, Liverpool, London, Manchester, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Norwich, Nottingham, Oxford, Peterborough, Plymouth, Portsmouth, Ripon, Salford, Salisbury, Sheffield, Southampton, St Albans, Stoke-on-Trent, Sunderland, Truro, Wakefield, Wells, Westminster, Winchester, Worcester and York.

Scotland:

Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Wales:

Bangor, Cardiff, St David's and Swansea.

Northern Ireland:

Armagh, Belfast and Londonderry/Derry.

 

Major Cities in United Kingdom by Population (2013)

Rank City 2013 Population
1 City of London 7,556,900
2 London 7,556,900
3 Birmingham 984,333
4 Glasgow 610,268
5 Liverpool 468,945
6 Leeds 455,123
7 Sheffield 447,047
8 Edinburgh 435,791
9 Bristol 430,713
10 Manchester 395,515
11 Leicester 339,239
12 Islington 319,143
13 Coventry 308,313
14 Hull 302,296
15 Cardiff 302,139
16 Bradford 299,310
17 Belfast 274,770
18 Stoke-on-Trent 260,419
19 Wolverhampton 252,791

 

 

Lecture 6a: Culture of the UK (Mass Media)

The British Media:

The Press.

Britain’s first papers appeared over 300 years ago. Now and then newspapers receive no government subsidy, unlike in some other European countries today. Advertising has always been a vital source of income. As long ago as 1660, King Charles II advertised in a newspaper for his lost dog. Today, income from advertising is as crucial as income from sales. In 1995, for example, £ 5,465 million was spent on press advertising, making the press by far the largest advertising medium in Britain.

There are approximately 130 daily and Sunday papers, 1,400 weekly papers and over 6,500 periodical publications. More newspapers, proportionately, are sold in Britain than in almost any other country. On average, two out of three people over the age of 15 read a national morning newspapers. National newspapers have a circulation of about 13 million an weekdays and 17 million on Sundays, but the readership is twice this figure. At first glance, therefore, the British press seems in good health.

The national newspapers, both on weekdays and on Sundays, fall into two broad categories: the 'popular' and 'quality' press.

Ownership of the press, as can be seen, is in the hands of a few large publishing groups. The most significant of these are News International, owned by the Australian-born press tycoon Rupert Murdoch, and the Mirror Group. Although the law provides safeguards against undue concentration of control in one company, the acquisitions of News International have caused concern. Its purchase of The Times in 1981 marked the beginning of a shift in that paper from an establishment view, politically slightly right of centre but independent, to a more openly right-wing position, in line with the right-wing flavour of the Conservative governments in the 1980s. It also acquired The Sunday Times, and two popular papers, the Sun, a daily, and the News of the World, a Sunday paper, both of which it successfully turned into the two largest circulation newspapers. Thus News International owns the papers read by over one-third of the newspaper-reading public. In 1989 it entered the television market by launching a satellite television network, now known as BSkyB Television.

Private ownership affects the political viewpoint of most newspapers. Most proprietors, or owners, are more sympathetic to a right of centre political viewpoint. Until the 1990s it could be claimed that 70 per cent of the newspapers sold supported a Conservative viewpoint. Among the populars, only the Daily and Sunday Mirror, and the People, express a left of centre view, while among the qualities The Guardian, and its sister Sunday paper, the Observer, reflect a moderate left-of-centre view. The Independent and The Financial Times tend to be left of centre on social issues while right of centre on economic ones, but would prefer to be viewed as non-aligned. In fact several right-of-centre papers supported a Labour victory in 1997, partly because of Conservative disarray, and partly because of Labour's perceived shift to the right.

Newspapers are either popular or quality. All the popular papers, with the exception of the Sunday Express, are 'tabloid' in format. The tabloids are essentially mass entertainment. They are smaller than the other papers, and are distinguished by large illustrations, bold captions and a sensational prose style. In the words of one ex-editor of The Times:

The values of mass journalism are the traditional romantic values of energy, intuition, personality, sexuality, excitement and myth. The romantic element in the mass mind responds instinctively to the energy in the mass newspaper. Readers are presented with an exciting world of demons and temptresses, a flickering and exotic fairy tale ...By contrast the values of the serious press are those of analysis, rationality, truth, lucidity, balance, reality and, I would hope, compassion.

The result is that the tabloids' news content is minimal and their emphasis is on gossip, emotion and scandal. By contrast quality newspapers, known as 'broadsheets' on account of their larger, rather cumbersome format, emphasize news coverage, political and economic analysis and social and cultural issues.

Since 1971 over three million readers have been lost, mainly from the populars. A fundamental reason lies with television becoming the main medium for news. Consequently all newspapers now give more attention to sports results, city finance and entertainment, but this has failed to halt the decline in readership.

Sunday readers have also declined. Since 1991 there has been a drop of one million in the number of populars sold each Sunday. Sunday quality papers have become fatter as the market competition increased during the 1980s. No Sunday quality paper can afford a circulation of less than about 400,000 without serious difficulty in attracting enough advertising. The Independent on Sunday (1990) was integrated with the daily The Independent in order to reduce production costs, but both seriously need to increase their circulation if their future is to be assured.

During the 1 980s virtually every paper was radically affected by new printing technology. Bitter conflicts were fought between management and the unions as the new technology was introduced. Almost every newspaper left its historic home in Fleet Street, known colloquially as 'the Street of Shame', the centre of the British press for over a century. Some went to new sites in London's Docklands, while others moved elsewhere. New technology increased the profitability of the press, and this in turn allowed the creation of new newspapers. Some of these flopped. The most important new paper was The Independent. Established in 1986, it rapidly seized the centre ground vacated by The Times, which had moved to the right following its purchase by Murdoch's News International. By 1990 its circulation was only slightly behind its two main competitors, The Times and The Guardian, and it rivalled The Times as 'the newspaper of the establishment'. However a sustained price war by The Times from 1993 seriously damaged The Independent's sales and by the mid-1 990s, its future looked uncertain. Circulation of The Times, however, increased from 350,000 in 1993 to 680,000 as a result of what its critics would describe as 'predatory' pricing.

Britain has a substantial number of regional newspapers also. Of these the two Scottish ones, The Scotsman (Edinburgh) and the Herald (Glasgow) are the most important, since they are also national papers. They each sell about 750,000 copies daily. But others with a large circulation include the Birmingham Evening Mail (200,000), the Wolverhampton Express and Star (208,000), the Birmingham Sunday Mercury (145,000), and the Leeds Yorkshire Post (75,000). These, too, are all in numerical decline.

Britain's ethnic minority communities also produce their own papers, both in English and in the vernacular languages. The oldest of these is the Jewish Chronicle, founded in 1841. But there are Asian, Caribbean and even Arabic newspapers published in Britain.

Finally, there are over 800 free newspapers, popularly known as 'freebies', almost all of them weekly and financed entirely by advertising. They achieve a weekly circulation of over 40 million. They function as local noticeboards, where local events are advertised, and anyone can advertise in the 'for sale' or 'wanted' columns.

The best-selling weeklies are those giving details of the forthcoming week's television and radio programmes, What's On TV, the Radio Times and TV Times, with circulations in 1996 of 1.6 million, 1.4 million and 1 million, respectively. Second to them in popularity are women's magazines, of which easily the best-selling is Take a Break, with a weekly sale of almost 1.5 million, and Woman's Weekly, Woman's Own, Woman, Woman's Realm, which sell between 300,000 and 800,000 copies each week. During the early 1990s some recently established men's magazines, Loaded, CQ and Esquire, became popular with circulations of 100,000 to 240,000. The leading opinion journals are The Economist, a slightly right-of-centre political and economic weekly, the New Statesman and Society, a left-of-centre political and social weekly, the Spectator, a right-of-centre political weekly, and Private Eye, a satirical fortnightly with a reputation for devastating attacks on leading personalities, and some libel suits against it in the law courts.

With almost 1,500 staff in 91 countries, no newspaper anywhere can compete with Britain's formidable news agency, Reuters. Across the world its name has become an assurance of objectivity, accuracy and reliability. Although run from London, Reuters deliberately avoids any image of being a British institution with English news values. As the day progresses, its world news file is edited from three different cities, switching time zones from Hong Kong to London to New York. Its reports are filed in French, German, Japanese, Arabic and Spanish, as well as English. Reuters also owns Reuters Television (RTV), the largest international television news agency in the world, providing news video to broadcasters in 89 countries.

The British Media:

Radio and television.

In 1936 the government established the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) to provide a public service in radio. It also began broadcasting that year on the recently invented television. At first solely through its agency, television and radio changed the entertainment habits and the culture of the nation. In 1955, however, the establishment of important but separate part of the BBC's work is its 'external services'. The BBC World Service broadcasts by radio in English and 43 vernacular languages. The service is funded separately from the rest of the BBC, by the Foreign Office. Although the BBC has freedom in the content of what it broadcasts, the government decides in which foreign languages it should broadcast, and the amount of funding it should receive. As such, the service is a promotional part of British foreign policy. The BBC World Service reaches an audience of approximately 140 million listeners, who are predominantly young (aged between 25 and 35) and male. The strength of the BBC's external services has been the provision of relatively objective and impartial news and comment to listeners in countries where local censorship exists.

In 1991 the BBC also commenced a commercial operation called Worldwide Television, which provides 24-hour news coverage and entertainment to broadcast networks in 80 countries and reaches an estimated 45 million homes. BBC World has only one rival, the American network, CNN. Where CNN has three times as many camera crews, the BBC has almost twice as many correspondents.

Television is the single most popular form of entertainment in Britain. In the mid-1990s viewers spent on average over three and a half hours daily in front of the television set. Until 1997 they had four terrestrial channels to choose from: BBC1 and BBC2, ITV (Independent Television) and Channel 4. Channel 4, which was established in 1982, specializes in minority interest programmes, but has proved highly successful. A third commercial channel, Channel 5, began broadcasting in 1997 and terrestrial broadcasting is likely to expand further. In 1996 legislation provided for transition of all broadcasting and telecommunications services from analogue frequency to digital transmission, probably early in the twenty-first century. Satellite broadcasting has been available since 1989. The major provider of satellite programmes is BSkyB. Cable television was introduced in 1993 and currently has 1.3 million subscribers BBC television and radio derives its income from an annual licence fee for television, while ITV and Channel 4 are financed solely through advertising. The question of financing by licence fee was strongly challenged by the Conservative government which argued that the BBC had to demonstrate its ability to operate with commercial efficiency in order to continue to enjoy public funding. As a consequence the BBC underwent a radical restructuring in the mid-1990s, with six separate components: BBC Broadcast, which schedules and commissions services for audiences; BBC Production, which develops in-house radio and television production; BBC News which provides an integrated national and international news operation; BBC Worldwide, to be responsible for generating income in Britain and abroad, and for the World Service; BBC Resources, to provide support and expertise to programme-makers; and BBC Corporate Services, to provide strategic services to the BBC as a whole. The danger, however, is that the drive for managerial efficiency will undermine the high quality of individual programmes. Take, for example, the new news operation. All news is now centrally gathered rather than by particular programmes. Leading BBC journalists protested strongly that this would threaten the distinctive ethos of particular news and current affairs programmes with a growing, and possibly bland, homogeneity. A compromise was struck, but the danger remains. In the words of one retired World Service director;

The tragedy is that a once great organisation - one of the finest creations of the liberal mind, one dedicated to an open and humane dialogue with its listeners and viewers, one that could carry out such dialogue because it conducted it internally first - has been subjected to such brutalising so-called 'managerialism'.

The fear is that the BBC's wonderful variety will be replaced by a unified and homogenised service, in news, sport, and other areas.

Since 1991 ITV has been governed through the Independent Television Commission, which is empowered to give regional franchises for a 10-year period to a number of different companies. There are 15 such companies, providing programmes many of which are sold or broadcast on other regional networks. When commercial television commenced in 1955 there had been fears that advertising would erode the high standards already set by the BBC. In fact ITV became fiercely competitive with the BBC in the production of high-quality programmes which, like the BBC's, were sold profitably to many foreign networks. Channel 4 provides an alternative service with more documentary, cultural and informative programmes. Channel 5 aspires to the same standards of quality as ITV, but has yet to achieve this. In Wales there is a special fourth channel, S4C (Sianel Pedwar Cymru) which provides a minimum of 32 hours of Welsh-medium broadcasting weekly. Since 1993 there has also been a Gaelic TV fund to assist the provision of Gaelic broadcasting on commercial television and radio.

The strength of British television lies in its high quality. 'Go anywhere in the world,' one leading political journalist has written, 'and British television is an object of envy and admiration ... . The foundation of Britain's excellence in the field of television is the tradition of public service broadcasting as upheld by the BBC Many involved in television, including foreigners living in Britain, claim that British television is the best in the world. Its export record and high audience ratings certainly suggest it is among the best. The reason lies in the quality of its innovation and its willingness to experiment. For example, British television enthusiastically took The Muppet Show, when its creator, Jim Henson, had been rejected by the American networks. In the fields of documentary, comedy and satire, or drama, British television is a world leader.

In 1990 the government passed the Broadcasting Act, which promised to change the basis of television from 1992 onwards. This act was inspired by two factors: the Conservative government's free-market ideology and the reality that satellite television would make it possible for viewers to receive programmes transmitted from outside Britain, which would effectively destroy the regulatory controls previously applied by government. In order to prepare Britain's own commercial television for the 'white heat' of competing with satellite television for audiences, and thus for advertisers, the intention of the Act was to open British commercial television to genuine and open competition. In 1992, an Independent Television Commission (ITC) replaced the Independent Television Authority and auctioned television transmission licences. It had the authority to use its discretion in awarding franchises on the basis of high quality, not merely to the top financial bidders. It is a recognition that there cannot be a wholly free market in television. As a result of the auction two major networks, Thames Television and also the morning service, TV-AM, both lost their franchises. The ITC also planned for a fifth television channel. But the danger remains that a larger number of channels will not, as is argued, provide greater choice. The greater the number of transmitting channels, the smaller the audiences will be for each individual channel. The smaller the audience, the less will be the advertising revenue possible, and if less advertising revenue is expected the production budget will be proportionately smaller. This is bound to hit hard a wide range of programmes, particularly minority ones.

It remains to be seen how this affects television in the long term. By the late 1990s it seemed that companies were generally less willing to invest heavily in the origination of expensive new programmes unless they were assured they would enjoy a franchise long enough to recoup their investment. Television is still unquestionably something Britain does really well. It remains to be seen whether the Broadcasting Act supports Britain's leading position, or weakens it.

Ever since the beginning of the 1980s there has been growing anxiety concerning pornographic and violent programmes. The Broadcasting Act provides for increased censorship. Any policeman of superintendent rank or above may demand access to any untransmitted material under the obscenity or public order laws. In addition, the Broadcasting Standards Council, created in 1989, is empowered to veto transmission of any programme it considers indecent. It is also empowered to censor imported material, although this is made meaningless by the high number of joint ventures in which British television is now engaged. Many parents have expressed considerable concern at the amount of sex and violence portrayed on television, particularly before 9 p.m., the time when younger children are expected to have gone to bed.

 

 

Lecture 6b: British Character

British values, beliefs and some national traits

National Traits

The British national traits result from the British way of life and the geographical position of the British Isles. For centuries the British have lived an insular life, being isolated from the rest of Europe. So, they acquired the following trait that are, of course, only a stereotype and are to be taken as a generalization:

J Self-assurance, confidence, independence. Sometimes the British show some sense of superiority (= snobbism, as a result of the class division of the society) and pride (they think themselves a very special nation that stands out from the other nations of Europe).

J Patriotism and national pride. The British still remember the glorious past of the British Empire that used to be one of the greatest empires in the world and still prefer to think they are a great nation regardless of the fact that the USA has surpassed it on the political arena.

J Tolerance of individual differences and eccentricities. The British never intrude in the lives of their neighbours (strong belief in private property and privacy) and accept the fact that they have right to do things their own way. Everybody has the right to live his life as he wishes to as long as it does not trouble the public order.

J Practicality and moderation. The British try to avoid extremes and choose the golden middle. They love comfort and hate stress. They are also a very law-abiding nation - sticking to the rules helps one to avoid stress and difficulties.

J Conservatism. The British love familiar things in familiar places and fear the introduction of something new and unknown in their life (that's why they still support the Monarchy). Moreover, customs and traditions are very important, are treasured and strictly observes.

J Coldness and reserve. It is said that the British are cold and reserved because they do not talk to strangers, do not show much emotion, never ask personal questions or give personal information about themselves. But once you get to know an Englishman better he turns to be a very friendly and sociable person.

J Modesty. The British do not like to boast or speak too much about themselves or their success in life.

J Politeness and tact. The British often use the formulas of politeness in speech (Pardon?, Would you please…?, etc.).

J Sense of humour. The British sense of humour is based on the ability to laugh at themselves, at their own faults. They use irony a lot and tell their jokes in a serious snobbish tone to make them sound ridiculous.

 

British Values

If you were to look at the United Kingdom, a thoroughly multicultural society, a fascinating spectrum of evolving culture would emerge. The values of the United Kingdom of today have been shaped by the cultural and ethnic diversity of its people. The four home nations – Ireland, Wales, Scotland and England along with the people of the erstwhile colonies, diverse heritage, different languages have all merged to create a distinct identity.

POLITENESS AND COURTESY

The British, and particularly the English, are renowned for their politeness and courtesy. They are known to be self disciplined. Basic courtesies like “please” and “thank you” are expected. Through the centuries Britain has laid great emphasis on this value. The influence of royalty and the system of social classes and titles have ensured that good manners and etiquette continue to be the foundation of British society. The British are very particular about social etiquette. People do not talk loudly in public or stare at anyone. It is considered inappropriate to talk to someone with your hands in your pocket. Or for that matter you don’t put your elbows on the table or chew with your mouth open.

As people, they are not very friendly and it is often difficult to start a conversation with the British if you do not know them. Conversation are short and at times may be restricted to just a single statement. The oft repeated saying is that the only way to draw a British into a conversation is to talk about the English weather as this is of great interest to him.

THE “STIFF UPPER LIP”

The British are said to be reserved in manner, dress and speech. This is a key element of British culture and an important aspect of the British communication style. Direct questions are avoided and often receive evasive responses and instructions are often veiled as polite requests. Often, tone of voice and facial expression are the main indicators of the actual intention. When you ask for an honest opinion you have to learn to read between the lines: 'That's an unusual outfit' might mean it's not very appropriate. 'That's an interesting argument' might mean 'I think you're quite wrong.' Have you heard of the term “stiff upper lip” - this term refers to the British reserve and restraint. The British avoid demonstrative display of emotions, positive or negative. There is formality in any interaction with the British. They observe strong codes of titles, when addressing each other. PUNCTUALITY

Punctuality is a very important value. The system of making appointments in advance is very prevalent. Since Britons are time conscious, the pace of life may seem rushed. People make a great effort to reach on time. It is considered impolite to even arrive a few minutes late. If you are unable to keep an appointment, it is expected that you call the person you are meeting.